Medvedev
2020-06-29 20:33:46
- #1
Hello friends,
I am new here, but I hope that I am in the right forum section with my issue and that you can help me.
We own a two-family house in Cologne, which we live in as a family. Our future neighbor had the neighboring house demolished and is now building new on the property. We have owned our house since 1995. Our house was built in 1984. We have a driveway gate with 2 masonry posts.
The architect of our future neighbor verbally informed us today that he intends to build a 1.5 meter high wall on our property boundary. For this purpose, he has already had an existing wooden fence, which was our property, removed without our consent. When confronted, he said he thought the fence belonged to the builder, his client.
He now also claims that our masonry post of the driveway gate (seen from the street on the left) stands about 10 cm on our future neighbor’s property and that it must therefore be demolished or removed so that a flush wall can be built.
The same applies to three wooden posts of our carport, which also protrude about 10 cm into the future neighbor’s property on the side.
Both would have to be dismantled at our expense as soon as possible so that he can continue building.
He said he would send us his demands in writing, which we would then have to sign accordingly.
So far, we have always assumed that our gate post stands fully (40x40 cm) on our property.
As proof, the architect handed us a drawing approved by the city of Cologne (with stamp as a copy), which is supposed to prove that the post and the posts protrude onto the neighbor’s property.
However, the post and the posts in question are not shown on the site plan.
According to the internet, a neighbor’s right expires after 3 years in relation to dismantling or similar matters. What do you think about this?
Hopefully, you can give us expert advice. We are grateful for your help!!
Best regards, Medvedev
I am new here, but I hope that I am in the right forum section with my issue and that you can help me.
We own a two-family house in Cologne, which we live in as a family. Our future neighbor had the neighboring house demolished and is now building new on the property. We have owned our house since 1995. Our house was built in 1984. We have a driveway gate with 2 masonry posts.
The architect of our future neighbor verbally informed us today that he intends to build a 1.5 meter high wall on our property boundary. For this purpose, he has already had an existing wooden fence, which was our property, removed without our consent. When confronted, he said he thought the fence belonged to the builder, his client.
He now also claims that our masonry post of the driveway gate (seen from the street on the left) stands about 10 cm on our future neighbor’s property and that it must therefore be demolished or removed so that a flush wall can be built.
The same applies to three wooden posts of our carport, which also protrude about 10 cm into the future neighbor’s property on the side.
Both would have to be dismantled at our expense as soon as possible so that he can continue building.
He said he would send us his demands in writing, which we would then have to sign accordingly.
So far, we have always assumed that our gate post stands fully (40x40 cm) on our property.
As proof, the architect handed us a drawing approved by the city of Cologne (with stamp as a copy), which is supposed to prove that the post and the posts protrude onto the neighbor’s property.
However, the post and the posts in question are not shown on the site plan.
According to the internet, a neighbor’s right expires after 3 years in relation to dismantling or similar matters. What do you think about this?
Hopefully, you can give us expert advice. We are grateful for your help!!
Best regards, Medvedev