Hhanghaus2023 2024-07-26 18:25:19#1I would probably have chosen a different one. But presumably, you rarely have a choice there. You can build on it like this.
I would probably have chosen a different one. But presumably, you rarely have a choice there. You can build on it like this.
Nnordanney 2024-07-26 19:40:10#3 The eaves height should be around 6.21m for all How do you come to the eaves height? In the development plan, the eaves heights are given with reference to NN. So for you, 641 above NN.
The eaves height should be around 6.21m for all How do you come to the eaves height? In the development plan, the eaves heights are given with reference to NN. So for you, 641 above NN.
Rre4p3r88 2024-07-27 08:35:11#4 I probably would have chosen a different one. But you rarely have a choice there If you really had the agony of choice. Just out of curiosity: which one would it have been for you?
I probably would have chosen a different one. But you rarely have a choice there If you really had the agony of choice. Just out of curiosity: which one would it have been for you?
Hhanghaus2023 2024-07-27 10:26:42#5 How do you arrive at the eaves height? In the development plan, the eaves heights are given with reference to NN. So for you 641 above NN. There are reference heights at the streets.
How do you arrive at the eaves height? In the development plan, the eaves heights are given with reference to NN. So for you 641 above NN. There are reference heights at the streets.
Mmotorradsilke 2024-07-27 10:48:50#6 If you really had the agony of choice. Out of pure interest: which one would it have been for you? No. 7, 1, 5, 4. In that order.
If you really had the agony of choice. Out of pure interest: which one would it have been for you? No. 7, 1, 5, 4. In that order.