BauenMS
2020-05-10 08:34:36
- #1
Hello,
in Münster, as in many places, house prices are relatively high and especially steadily rising. My wife and I (2 children) are now faced with the question: Either buy a home that we can definitely pay off by retirement or one that meets our wishes but cannot be paid off by retirement with the current installment plan. I actually find the latter quite reasonable, for the following reasons:
I would just be worried that one might regret at some point, when one has paid off a house at 60 and suddenly has money left over and then also inherits, that one has not lived their life in a bigger house or at least with a bigger garden.
Stupid/naive, understandable? Gaps in reasoning? Looking forward to feedback.
in Münster, as in many places, house prices are relatively high and especially steadily rising. My wife and I (2 children) are now faced with the question: Either buy a home that we can definitely pay off by retirement or one that meets our wishes but cannot be paid off by retirement with the current installment plan. I actually find the latter quite reasonable, for the following reasons:
[*]The price situation in Münster is at least stable, if not even steadily increasing. That means selling the house is quite likely possible under good conditions. Then only the interest would be lost, but possibly there would be a gain through appreciation.
[*]The property even has the potential to sell part of it in the future in case of financial shortage or to build another house on it yourself and rent or sell it.
[*]Our parents have houses that are also largely paid off; so we may eventually inherit to pay off the remaining debt. Conversely: If one planned without any remaining debt and the inheritance actually came, one would have a lot of money but not the house one always wanted.
[*]In the remaining debt calculation, if we consider that we will increase the installment in the future through salary increases and extra work (the installment is just about right for the current parental leave; with the following 150% work from both of us, it would already be manageable, and if we both eventually work 100% again, we could pay a significantly higher rate or make special repayments.
[*]In old age, one could also rent out part of the house and thus continue to service the installment.
[*]Ultimately, it was always part of the plan for us to possibly sell a house once the children are out of the house – that would be before retirement anyway and then with a remaining debt.
I would just be worried that one might regret at some point, when one has paid off a house at 60 and suddenly has money left over and then also inherits, that one has not lived their life in a bigger house or at least with a bigger garden.
Stupid/naive, understandable? Gaps in reasoning? Looking forward to feedback.