AnJaLi
2021-08-22 12:49:28
- #1
Hello everyone,
we live in a two-family house with 2 full floors (1st living unit) and a converted attic. (2nd living unit)
Our apartment in the attic extends over two levels, with a gallery and an adjacent room upstairs. The gallery counts as living space, the adjacent room officially only as usable space.
Now we would like to have more roof windows installed on the upper level to make it a bit brighter and to enjoy the view of the forest.
At a later stage, we would like to apply for a change of use for the room.
There is a development plan that stipulates the following:
"In all areas, roof windows at different heights are excluded.
Roof windows are to be limited to 0.75 m in width and 1.50 m in height.
The sum of all roof window widths must not exceed 25% of the respective eaves length.
Stacking roof windows one above the other is excluded."
The eaves length is 9.60 m, so we are allowed a total window width of 2.4 m.
Now to the questions.
- What exactly is meant by the first sentence? Must the bottom edge of all roof windows be at the same height?
- Is the width specified in the development plan the total width of the window? For example, if I look at the window manufacturer V, only 0.66 m would be possible since the next larger width is already 0.78 m. Correct?
- For the 2nd escape route for the change of use, we need 0.9 m clear width. According to the development plan, this is not possible. In the documents of the previous owner, a change of use was already considered in 2001. At that time, there was also a building permit for the conversion. However, it was not carried out. Does this mean approval can also deviate from the development plan? Or was it different then than today?
- Is it possible to deviate slightly from the 2.4 m width? For example, if it would end up being 2.46 m?
I hope I was able to express everything somewhat understandably. All this stuff with building regulations etc. is just too much for me...
we live in a two-family house with 2 full floors (1st living unit) and a converted attic. (2nd living unit)
Our apartment in the attic extends over two levels, with a gallery and an adjacent room upstairs. The gallery counts as living space, the adjacent room officially only as usable space.
Now we would like to have more roof windows installed on the upper level to make it a bit brighter and to enjoy the view of the forest.
At a later stage, we would like to apply for a change of use for the room.
There is a development plan that stipulates the following:
"In all areas, roof windows at different heights are excluded.
Roof windows are to be limited to 0.75 m in width and 1.50 m in height.
The sum of all roof window widths must not exceed 25% of the respective eaves length.
Stacking roof windows one above the other is excluded."
The eaves length is 9.60 m, so we are allowed a total window width of 2.4 m.
Now to the questions.
- What exactly is meant by the first sentence? Must the bottom edge of all roof windows be at the same height?
- Is the width specified in the development plan the total width of the window? For example, if I look at the window manufacturer V, only 0.66 m would be possible since the next larger width is already 0.78 m. Correct?
- For the 2nd escape route for the change of use, we need 0.9 m clear width. According to the development plan, this is not possible. In the documents of the previous owner, a change of use was already considered in 2001. At that time, there was also a building permit for the conversion. However, it was not carried out. Does this mean approval can also deviate from the development plan? Or was it different then than today?
- Is it possible to deviate slightly from the 2.4 m width? For example, if it would end up being 2.46 m?
I hope I was able to express everything somewhat understandably. All this stuff with building regulations etc. is just too much for me...