master2006
2023-09-11 12:19:11
- #1
Dear Sir or Madam
I am new here and have a question right away. Our house (old building) was renovated, including the floor coverings. Upstairs we have a granny flat (used internally), which is somewhat special in its construction. One room (1) is built on a beam structure (as is common in wooden houses), the other room (2) is on a concrete structure (was built on later). In room 1, the floorboards were removed at the time and a new structure with 3-layer panels was installed (first a battens layer, then the 3-layer panels). This was a measure for stability. In room 2, the "Klötzli parquet" was removed, underneath it is a solid concrete ceiling. Subsequently, the parquet in room 1 was glued directly onto the 3-layer panels, in room 2 the level was first adjusted and leveled with leveling compound and then the parquet was glued directly onto it. My question is whether, from a professional point of view, an impact sound insulation should still have been installed, or whether it is acceptable as it is?
I am new here and have a question right away. Our house (old building) was renovated, including the floor coverings. Upstairs we have a granny flat (used internally), which is somewhat special in its construction. One room (1) is built on a beam structure (as is common in wooden houses), the other room (2) is on a concrete structure (was built on later). In room 1, the floorboards were removed at the time and a new structure with 3-layer panels was installed (first a battens layer, then the 3-layer panels). This was a measure for stability. In room 2, the "Klötzli parquet" was removed, underneath it is a solid concrete ceiling. Subsequently, the parquet in room 1 was glued directly onto the 3-layer panels, in room 2 the level was first adjusted and leveled with leveling compound and then the parquet was glued directly onto it. My question is whether, from a professional point of view, an impact sound insulation should still have been installed, or whether it is acceptable as it is?