Liapor or stone on stone: Which construction method is better?

As far as I know, - as writes - for KfW 40 (+) the entire house must be considered. Only for KFW 55 is there the alternative verification option to comply with minimum values for the individual components.

Say goodbye to the pictorial idea of a stuffed animal with filling spilling out of a ripped seam. Liapor is not a hollow block with popcorn in the chambers, but rather a kind of pumice stone – only with clay instead of lava – and KLB, Bisotherm & Co are stones as stable elements. Apart from the filling, pumice like expanded clay has a structure somewhat coarser like aerated concrete or perforated bricks, similar to Edam compared to Gouda.

But he looks like a stuffed teddy bear.

He looks like a stuffed teddy bear.

The bottom edge is also open, without the thing arriving half-empty at the construction site and the filling having to be swept off the flatbed.