NlKlopa
2022-05-03 09:04:52
- #1
Hello everyone
I am NIKIopa and new here in the forum. Since our municipality wants to initiate a land readjustment procedure for an industrial area, I have some questions here. The readjustment is to be carried out based on values.
According to my research on the internet, all essential quality characteristics of the properties are to be considered in the calculation of the contribution values. If one of the parties contributes a property that already meets the objectives of a readjustment (to create buildable properties according to size/shape/location), must this be taken into account in the valuation? That is, may this piece be valued just like the other properties (narrow and long), for which the aforementioned conditions must first be created? Is an expert allowed to simply ignore this (it is less work than if he had to value the properties differently, with the same remuneration)?
If someone contributes 10,000 m² and 25% is deducted for public areas, they have an allocation claim of 7,500 m² x price/m² after readjustment. Since it is done based on values: can I also be allocated significantly less area, although I contribute that percentage of the total area remaining after deduction? After all, I also contribute this percentage of the total readjustment area.
What does "ratio of the values of the affected properties to each other before the readjustment" specifically mean? Does this only apply to the standard land value or also to other characteristics? (see above).
If an area affected by contamination is involved: may it be valued like all other areas?
If the contaminated area is allocated back to the previous owner, which valuation may then be applied to the allocation area? (e.g., a company is interested in the property but demands a substantial discount on the purchase price due to contamination).
Does contamination affect the entire property or only the part with contamination?
If several contaminated areas are involved in the procedure, what is the situation if a party is no longer allocated a contaminated area? (they then have an advantage because they can sell the allocated area without contamination)
Best regards NlKlopa
I am NIKIopa and new here in the forum. Since our municipality wants to initiate a land readjustment procedure for an industrial area, I have some questions here. The readjustment is to be carried out based on values.
According to my research on the internet, all essential quality characteristics of the properties are to be considered in the calculation of the contribution values. If one of the parties contributes a property that already meets the objectives of a readjustment (to create buildable properties according to size/shape/location), must this be taken into account in the valuation? That is, may this piece be valued just like the other properties (narrow and long), for which the aforementioned conditions must first be created? Is an expert allowed to simply ignore this (it is less work than if he had to value the properties differently, with the same remuneration)?
If someone contributes 10,000 m² and 25% is deducted for public areas, they have an allocation claim of 7,500 m² x price/m² after readjustment. Since it is done based on values: can I also be allocated significantly less area, although I contribute that percentage of the total area remaining after deduction? After all, I also contribute this percentage of the total readjustment area.
What does "ratio of the values of the affected properties to each other before the readjustment" specifically mean? Does this only apply to the standard land value or also to other characteristics? (see above).
If an area affected by contamination is involved: may it be valued like all other areas?
If the contaminated area is allocated back to the previous owner, which valuation may then be applied to the allocation area? (e.g., a company is interested in the property but demands a substantial discount on the purchase price due to contamination).
Does contamination affect the entire property or only the part with contamination?
If several contaminated areas are involved in the procedure, what is the situation if a party is no longer allocated a contaminated area? (they then have an advantage because they can sell the allocated area without contamination)
Best regards NlKlopa