Insulation of 1960s flat roof bungalow

  • Erstellt am 2020-08-16 20:51:15

Labmann

2020-08-16 20:51:15
  • #1
Dear community,

we have bought a partially basemented (on a slope), single-story flat-roof bungalow in our favorite city and now want to renovate it. It is not a prefabricated house but was individually designed at the time by an architect for the builders. We now need decision support or criteria for decision-making on the subject of façade insulation (the roof was newly insulated and foil-covered in 1999). When searching for the above-mentioned criteria, one often reads about avoiding a WDVS insulation of the entire façade due to the risk of mold and instead limiting oneself to insulating the basement ceiling or room ceiling. A friend who is a construction contractor advised insulating everything possible if you also want to renew windows and shutters. What do you think about these two viewpoints? Perhaps someone can report from their own experiences or projects. We would be very grateful for help!

Thank you very much, Tobi
 

nordanney

2020-08-16 21:56:32
  • #2

... and the fools still believe in it.

The question is, what is your goal? First of all, old windows are real energy wasters. You can insulate the basement ceiling very well and cheaply by yourself (sticking PUR aluminum-laminated WLG 23 is no rocket science – 10 cm is good if the ceiling height allows).

Well insulated? How?

Looks great. But with calcium silicate boards, it’s also a real bargain. Why should one do that?

Do everything. I think it’s good if the budget allows. For KfW 55 you even get a 40% subsidy for the measures (I am planning this myself, otherwise at least 20%) and you have a house with the latest standard (although your roof probably ruins much of it, theoretically).
Only basement ceiling and interior corners. Nonsense! Basement ceiling definitely in connection with windows/front door. That already helps a lot. If there is money for exterior insulation, I would definitely do it (have it done). Alone the new look and of course also some energy savings make it worthwhile. And with the bungalow the labor is extremely low.
 

Labmann

2020-08-16 22:37:56
  • #3
Thank you for the response! First of all: our goal is to improve the current energy efficiency. Not necessarily to perfect it according to high-end standards but to improve it. Of course, unlimited financial resources are not available, so we want to find a balanced approach and bring the 1960s house with its now 60-year-old building fabric to an adequate "improved" condition, with which one can (hopefully) be satisfied until retirement without further extensive construction measures. In other words: we don’t need the ultimate result, but want to live in a future-oriented, modern way. You don’t seem enthusiastic about the calcium silicate boards; you talk about "a little energy savings" with external insulation. I thought it was basically "the" method to become more energy-efficient, and internal insulation can never achieve what external insulation could. If it’s only "a little," with our goal it might possibly be omitted... Regarding the roof: cross-section drawing is attached. I look forward to further input!
 

nordanney

2020-08-17 06:51:49
  • #4

That is always the last option, as interior insulation a) always has to be very well calculated b) requires very clean workmanship c) costs living space and d) costs multiple times more per square meter compared to exterior insulation. It is usually only done in case of moisture in the apartment or with houses where exterior insulation is not possible (e.g. due to monument protection).

Interior insulation can be just as effective as exterior insulation. However, with limited resources, it is not the preferred method. The cost-performance ratio is much better for windows, cellar ceilings, and the top floor ceiling. Exactly how much can be saved must be calculated, but energy-efficient renovations do not start with exterior insulation, but with the measures I mentioned.

I cannot judge what the 16cm insulation in the roof amounts to. That depends on the material (WLG?).

Definitely consult an energy advisor (which is funded by KfW) and not just the contractor (whose assessment is probably biased). That way you will also get funding and make the renovation more attractive.
 

Similar topics
25.05.2015Extractor hood / roof or wall14
24.05.2015KfW 55 with wooden house - U-values: Wall 0.18 - Roof 0.1617
05.05.2016Insulate the roof: flakes, panels or wool17
16.07.2017Empty facade, highlight32
20.10.2017Roof with photovoltaic or other investment, any experiences?19
16.02.2019Manufacturing S-shaped facade - construction method22
25.03.2019Ceiling suddenly too small for controlled residential ventilation!54
02.12.2019Single-family house (2 floors + residential basement + developed attic) approximately 200 sqm - changes162
07.12.2019Bank guarantee from the roofer due to defects in the roof16
08.02.2023Insulate utility cellar or not?24
27.02.2020Is the vapor barrier in the roof vapor-permeable? Yes? No!16
10.04.2020Rainwater from the roof - drainage in the soil for discharge?12
16.01.2023Full rafter insulation roof or insulation on concrete slab40
25.10.2020Insulating the concrete ceiling of the upper floor / What to watch out for?17
27.10.2021Photovoltaic system 120 sqm living area - cover the entire roof?45
29.11.2022Front view windows are suboptimal and need to be optimized90
14.06.2023Neighbor is building a garden house, the roof extends beyond the property boundary21
29.11.2023Bought a modern house. Roof not well insulated?12
02.07.2024Development according to §34 - Large house with steep roof required11

Oben