Financing needs/opportunities

  • Erstellt am 2015-07-27 18:08:45

Musketier

2015-08-06 13:38:42
  • #1
I also have such an old home savings contract with 2% + 2.5% if the loan is not used. It should actually be as you describe. The disadvantage will be that everything has to be paid interest on within one year, so the allowance will not be sufficient, and therefore you can only expect a payout of 3.4%. What I do not know is how the withdrawal affects the clause.

In addition, you should be careful not to overfund the home savings contract and that it does not become eligible for allocation for longer than 10 years. That now leads to termination.
 

HB-NH2015

2015-08-06 15:17:49
  • #2
They are still far from over-saving and we still have a 5-9 year buffer to the 10 years for the allocation.

The thing with interest / allowance is of course a valid point. But anything > 2% is still better than 2%. You just shouldn't be disappointed if you don't get the whole cake.



It would be nice if someone could confirm that. Maybe someone recently cashed out a home savings contract without a loan. Or it was terminated.
2% and 5% have been a huge difference over the past 14 years... even if the state will of course hold out its hand for >1,602 € allowance.
 

Martin-84

2015-08-07 11:41:11
  • #3


With my old building savings contract, the interest is credited annually and the withholding tax is also deducted annually. The same applies to my wife's two building savings contracts.
The tax is withheld when the interest is credited and not only when the balance is paid out after so many years.
 

Musketier

2015-08-07 11:50:14
  • #4


For the normal interest, you are right. For the special bonus (here 5%), which is only paid out upon loan waiver, the taxation of course takes place in the final year.
 

Musketier

2015-08-07 12:41:52
  • #5
That’s correct. It does not increase by 5%, but to 5%.
 

merlin83

2015-08-08 09:55:00
  • #6
Calculating a lot does not improve the income or make financing cheaper. The calculated income surplus has no practical significance, as the reality looks quite different in most cases.

Start recording your account transactions and observe how your monthly cash flow develops. It should be noted that about 200 euros per month still go away from the surplus, for the depreciation of each vehicle assigned to you.
 

Similar topics
17.08.2013Financing offer - Interest okay? Your opinion...10
08.04.2015Offer of financial consulting - Is the interest rate okay?15
18.04.2015Is a building savings contract still worthwhile with the current interest rates?10
28.06.2015Building a house - building savings contract with bad interest rates23
12.09.2015Repayment or Repayment + Home Savings Plan10
16.09.2015Home bank financing, building society saver, repayment11
18.03.2016Should you "almost empty" the building savings account?13
28.05.2016Annuity loan - Offered interest rates / Key points?17
22.06.2016Is a TA loan sensible? Interest and loan offer are okay13
27.03.2017Forward loan - Secure interest rates now?53
18.08.2017No building savings/little equity and construction/purchase plans in the near future?18
25.10.2018How do you take the interest into account from the purchase of the land until moving in?59
04.07.2019TA loan with building saver - read a lot, yet did not find the catch.13
04.11.2019Ongoing home savings contract regarding special repayment and allocation maturity18
12.09.2021Purchase financing: how much equity (with the low interest rates)?27
11.07.2022House construction still realistic despite rising interest rates / construction costs?54
25.11.2022Increase repayment or top up building savings?20
11.10.2023New construction with KFN 297, building savings and interim financing14
09.09.2024Bridge loan before allocation of home savings contract18
17.01.2025Financing offer single-family house including building savings, experiences25

Oben