Extension of construction time due to scaffolding

But you have already signed that you guarantee unrestricted access as the client, haven't you? How do you intend to manage that when the access is blocked by scaffolding? The one in front actually has the right to install a ladder to do so. It's confusing who could sue whom for rights here.

signed something afterwards? no way

But you have already signed that you guarantee unrestricted access as the builder, right? How do you intend to ensure this if the access is blocked by scaffolding? The person in front has the ladder right to do so. It's confusing who could sue whom for rights here.

In our understanding, it should be like that. The house of A has 4.50 m of space on the left to the property boundary. There, the construction road was also built 3 meters wide. That means there would still be about 1.50 m of space for the scaffolding. In our understanding, scaffolding is not wider than these 1.50 m. A fastening without having to drill into the house, or without a support on the construction road, should be possible. We thank everyone for their answers. We also understand that one cannot get a "clear" answer.

The ceiling just comes with a 40-tonner. Three meters are not enough. And then somewhere the mobile crane has to be placed to lift it up there.

Let's have the schedules shown, when and how much time shortage exists. Talk and find a solution.

The problem has only now appeared in the detailed planning for the first time, even your contract reviewers have overlooked it.

React flexibly and not like Rumpelstilzchen before it has even started.

I understand it this way: Due to the scaffolding, the rear house cannot be built independently of the front house, as the access becomes too narrow because of scaffolding on the front house. It is logical to start the rear house and advance the work to the point where the front house can be scaffolded and work can continue on the rear house – the vehicles for the interior fitters are usually significantly narrower and would have space to pass alongside the scaffolding of the front house. For moving into the rear house, if moving vans are used, the scaffolding on the front house should be removed again. It is fair that price increases are excluded in writing for the front house. So, there is a temporal overlap. Is this reflected in the agreed deadlines? I find the proposed written form somewhat complicated but not further problematic. With or without paper, it is clear that the construction time of the front house is connected with that of the rear house. Writing this down creates clarity and prevents disputes. Only if the clients insist on a clause that guarantees them penalties for late completion will they find it difficult to sign.