Double insulation below and above the floor slab?

  • Erstellt am 2016-11-26 11:39:37

torsten80

2016-11-26 11:39:37
  • #1
Hello everyone,

we are in the final planning stage of our single-family house. Since it is (probably like for most) our first house, we are of course at best amateurs in this field.

Here are some key data about the house:
Type: timber frame construction without a basement
Standard: KfW 40plus
Base area: 106m²
Living area: 165m²

Regarding the insulation, I have the following question:
A 140mm thick perimeter insulation (WLG035) is laid under the floor slab (at the ends it is 100mm)
The construction company has now told me that the floor inside the house will also receive another 100mm insulation towards the floor slab, on top of which the underfloor heating will be installed. My question is whether it is actually necessary to insulate the floor again with this thickness against the floor slab. After all, the installation costs for the underfloor heating including the mentioned insulation and the subsequent screed amount to a considerable €19,000 for 155m² of heated area.

Thanks for your assessment.

Best regards
Torsten
 

tomtom79

2016-11-26 17:20:24
  • #2
Why kfw40?
 

Alex85

2016-11-26 19:27:39
  • #3


It's no problem at all with a timber frame. Whether it has to be 40+, meaning with photovoltaics and storage – well. We're currently dealing with that topic in many threads, I would just be repeating myself here.
 

tomtom79

2016-11-26 20:15:05
  • #4
I wanted to hear it from the thread creator because I think kfw is really for individualists. Especially since he asks so puzzled, it sounds more like he wants to save money.

And the additional costs compared to 55 or 70 never get saved again.
 

Alex85

2016-11-26 20:22:00
  • #5


And the thread creator wanted to know something about insulation in the floor structure and not about the purpose of the KfW 40 standard. We just don't always get what we want.



My post was a hint that even wood studs in "standard version" mostly achieve insulation values that meet the KFW 40 standard. Ergo no additional costs.
 

tomtom79

2016-11-26 20:36:46
  • #6
Well, if he is already questioning the purpose of the double insulation, I still assume that he does not want it.

PS even though our KfW 70 timber frame house would easily reach KfW 40 on paper, other cost factors still come into play.

Example blowdoor test with a small n50, to achieve that you do need a few extra things.

I believe that with KfW 40, solar is even mandatory, etc.

But maybe the thread creator will say something about it.
 

Similar topics
10.07.2011Wall construction and insulation for Kfw 70 house, okay?19
31.05.2015Wastewater pipe concreted in the floor slab at the wrong location29
08.11.2012Insulation in the 70s compared to today, modern insulation, heating costs26
24.07.2013Additional costs due to underfloor heating11
20.12.2013New underfloor heating instead of radiators and controlled residential ventilation; yes or no?15
27.11.2014Questions about underfloor heating with geothermal energy40
23.10.2016Thermal insulation, Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW 70 / 55 / 40 - Your experiences31
18.01.2016Height for underfloor heating10
11.09.2016Base plate - construction/insulation etc. - experiences please!10
13.09.2016Insulation under the floor slab EPS or XPS?12
29.03.2018Having underfloor heating milled in afterwards. Experiences!!!13
28.08.2017Old building renovation - gas heating + radiators or underfloor heating?10
06.10.2019Base plate with concrete core activation. What is your opinion?46
26.02.2018Insulation under reinforced concrete floor slab KFW5520
30.05.2018Base plate on the top edge or bottom edge? Who has experience?10
03.02.2019Underfloor heating in the floor slab - advantages and disadvantages?15
09.02.2019Ground slab with strip foundation and frost skirt23
22.07.2022Insulation for the top floor ceiling - which material?14

Oben