Bautitus
2021-02-19 22:14:19
- #1
Hello dear forum users,
we are building a house with an architect. Recently, screeding work was carried out at our place. During this, the shell construction, which was supposed to remain visible, was heavily soiled and damaged in several places.
In my opinion, this constitutes a defect because the other trade was not sufficiently protected. However, I wonder how I should proceed to achieve defect remediation.
The screeding company does not want to take any action because, in their opinion, it is "shell construction" and nothing could have been done about it. According to the opinion of other companies that were present, what they did was a big mess. From their reports, I have learned that normally it goes differently. In particular, the hoses are secured with straps to control vibrations/shocks and thus minimize the likelihood of such damage. However, I could not find any DIN standard that would require this.
Is it possible to hold the architect somehow liable, since ultimately a defect-free object will not be handed over? He also did not supervise how the work was carried out. He is completely abandoning us on this matter as well. Does he have no obligations? ([wurde für alle Leistungsphasen beauftragt])
I would be very grateful for any tips.
we are building a house with an architect. Recently, screeding work was carried out at our place. During this, the shell construction, which was supposed to remain visible, was heavily soiled and damaged in several places.
In my opinion, this constitutes a defect because the other trade was not sufficiently protected. However, I wonder how I should proceed to achieve defect remediation.
The screeding company does not want to take any action because, in their opinion, it is "shell construction" and nothing could have been done about it. According to the opinion of other companies that were present, what they did was a big mess. From their reports, I have learned that normally it goes differently. In particular, the hoses are secured with straps to control vibrations/shocks and thus minimize the likelihood of such damage. However, I could not find any DIN standard that would require this.
Is it possible to hold the architect somehow liable, since ultimately a defect-free object will not be handed over? He also did not supervise how the work was carried out. He is completely abandoning us on this matter as well. Does he have no obligations? ([wurde für alle Leistungsphasen beauftragt])
I would be very grateful for any tips.