Construction financing: Is building a house possible? Please provide an assessment

  • Erstellt am 2019-01-04 09:54:38

face26

2019-01-04 19:01:06
  • #1


Ok, I’ll try to be objective...

Everyone here is making assumptions, you too. Who says they don’t have to furnish everything new?

The OP asked for assessments. That was mine. It is based partly on professional experience, personal experience, and also on what has been read here. What the OP takes from it is his own business.

The OP provided some information and that is what I oriented myself on. And I at least tried to present that in a comprehensible way. Since we don’t know more, I always assume an average case. And the average does not take the kitchen with it, buys some furniture and has a few other expenses.

200,000 property + 5% property transfer tax = €10,000

Equity gone. Not even paid the notary yet.

Do a counter calculation as you think, how the OP builds a house with the stated conditions and €10,000 equity.
 

HilfeHilfe

2019-01-04 19:06:16
  • #2
Well, once again I was right about the tax classes, well, they are freshly finished. But let’s be honest, 700k financing with part-time work and a child is a no-go. Even 500k would give me stomach aches. The question is what existing properties cost in BW. The burden is simply calculated. 500k at 4.5% interest and repayment (optimistic calculation) with a high remaining debt at the end... That would already be 1875€ annuity per month alone... can one want and can one do that? I’d say rather not
 

Milo3

2019-01-04 19:13:24
  • #3
I am with the invoice with you, however, there is no property yet, so still some time to save. One really doesn’t need to discuss the 1.5% notary fees now. By the way, the kitchen is also not an item that is immediately due. The only question the OP should ask themselves is whether they can afford 500+ k or want to tie themselves down. Even if it was unobjective from me. Such a forecast can be both pessimistic and optimistic – maybe the OP will find a newly founded reputable company that seeks contracts “cheaply.” Furthermore, they might also find a property for slightly less than 200k.
 

hemali2003

2019-01-04 19:36:06
  • #4
In your place, I would first consider exactly how the family planning should look. That is, who will stay at home for how long and how much income will still be available to you. This must form the basis for financing. After parental leave, one could then plan to increase the annuity. But please plan carefully, for example, I don't know anyone who hasn't stayed at home longer than originally planned. Everyone extended because they really couldn't bring themselves to put the child in daycare at 12/18 months. Or the planned 30 hours with a daycare child were unimaginable and they started again with only 15/20 hours. You simply cannot estimate this in advance, so don't plan too optimistically.

You would be willing to stay at home. Would your wife be willing to forgo that?? My husband would have done the same - earlier I found the idea quite charming. When I became pregnant, however, it was completely unthinkable to go back to work after 8 weeks. I really don't know any woman for whom that would have been an option. And there are quite a few for whom it would have made more financial sense the other way around.
 

Jean-Marc

2019-01-04 19:55:41
  • #5
No matter whether one believes it is financially feasible or not: If even two decent salaries are no longer enough to put up a house in a rural area, then something has gone seriously wrong in this country and a little construction child allowance won't be able to fix that anymore! If this isn't a bubble, then I don't know what is...

(I sometimes wonder how my displaced (= 0.00 equity) grandfather, as the sole earner working in a factory band with a wife and 5 children, managed to afford his 150 sqm own home with a full basement and garage on an 800 sqm plot and what he would roughly need net today for the same undertaking...)
 

face26

2019-01-04 20:07:26
  • #6


Off topic and I don’t know from which time we are talking about but just a few points:
Post-war period = land cost nothing and also provided a lot more
Building often meant spending 1-2 years every minute you were not at work, or sleeping on the construction site.
Everyone you knew helped
No energy saving regulations
Different lifestyle, different definition of basic needs
During the economic miracle in Germany, you got a decent salary increase and every overtime hour was paid...
 

Similar topics
07.07.2011Financing land now, house in 6 months?17
31.05.2012Financing of the property: Does the entire financing need to be secured?11
14.11.2013Is financing for construction projects feasible?10
21.08.2014Is financing without equity realistic?19
27.10.2014Fixed interest rate financing without equity?20
21.02.2015Impacts on loan when equity is in property17
18.12.2015Financing unequal equity ratios of unmarried partners24
19.11.2015Land is in sight - Financing feasible?11
22.01.2016Financing Land & Corner Bungalow20
10.04.2016Property as equity? Living costs with children?19
21.04.2016Is financing with land and equity possible like this?20
13.08.2016Variable or fixed financing for land?11
08.08.2017Buy land with cash? How to build financing?44
11.03.2020Land as equity capital - Worth the wait?10
13.10.2020Land available - ancillary construction costs, ancillary house costs, financing?34
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
31.12.2020Land purchase with varied financing - is it sensible to hold back equity?10
26.06.2021How much equity is needed for home purchase financing?15
06.03.2023Pledge existing property to increase equity?13

Oben