Construction financing - Different statements by intermediaries

  • Erstellt am 2021-05-13 20:07:48

Benutzername77

2021-05-13 20:07:48
  • #1
Hello,

I have an offer from a property developer for a house with land.
Previously, I had already inquired at Interhyp and provided my personal "key data" and a "fictional" construction project to see if and how financing is possible.
I received various financing offers/options and, based on my key data (civil servant, income, expenses), was also told that there were probably "no concerns"...
A week later, as I said, I also had the offer from the property developer, which corresponds quite exactly to my "fictional" construction project (location, size, usage, costs, etc.)
However, the property developer/seller said that the financing should be done through "his" mortgage lender because he works with him on all construction projects ("If he can't manage it, then no one can," "He sometimes has direct contacts with the banks and can also solve difficult cases" ...and similar common statements).
Since I am not necessarily bound to Interhyp and I am also quite "emotionally detached" about it, I turned to "his" mortgage lender with the same "key data," etc.
But from him, rather statements like "I see financing as difficult," "all banks light up red for me," "we still need to do some follow-up work" came.
My question is, are there such differences between mortgage lenders, or does Interhyp handle offers somewhat more leniently... or am I perhaps a difficult case after all?

I know this is quite general, but maybe someone can share some inside information or has an explanation for this?

Thank you :)
 

ypg

2021-05-13 21:12:53
  • #2


Yes, one calculates more reliably, the other does not. They also offer different terms, depending on their philosophy or your facts.

We don't know. We don't know your salary and your financial situation. Then you are also single... there aren't many banks that provide financing for a single person. Most want two incomes as security.
 

derschorsch

2021-05-13 21:24:58
  • #3
Unfortunately, it is often the case that intermediaries see everything through rose-colored glasses, hoping to somehow push the financing through.

Just think about it:
Where do you feel more comfortable (at first) – with the intermediary who immediately says "Everything is easy, we can fulfill your big dream" or with the one who says "It's tight, you'd better save a little more, then it will be easier to present...."?
 

Benutzername77

2021-05-13 21:39:35
  • #4


That is a good point. Thank you.
 

Benutzername77

2021-05-13 22:01:16
  • #5


Thank you very much for the answer. During the consultation with Interhyp, I was able to directly see the input mask of the financial broker and also immediately the possible banks with approval and the corresponding conditions. That is why it looked quite promising and serious to me. But of course each broker approaches it differently.
 

ypg

2021-05-13 22:14:58
  • #6
Since you have already posted your house design in parallel (I must admit that I confused you with another Will builder who also wants to build a miracle of space but is single), the numbers possibly do not surprise me. What numbers did the first broker have on the table? What does your further cost plan look like? How much equity and how much financing did you want for what? The bank person from Town & Country probably has the background knowledge about the additional incidental costs that the Interhyp person did not have?! Let’s not kid ourselves: for 200,000 you can no longer get a house from Town & Country, nor any affordable wood at the moment.
 
Oben