Häuslebauer3
2023-01-27 15:56:33
- #1
Hello dear members,
my partner and I are interested in acquiring and renovating a 1960s single-family house. Our desired financing would be a combination of 3 individual loans, all taken out through the same bank: Loan 1: Regular bank loan Loan 2: KFW 124 Home Ownership Program Loan 3: KFW 261 Residential Building (Goal: EE 70, but 85 would also be acceptable)
We would purchase the house with equity as well as Loan 1 & 2. The renovation would then be paid for with Loan 3 and additional equity (this equity for the renovation will not be part of the loan contract, i.e. officially we would only renovate for €150k [= full amount KFW 261]). We are currently in close contact with 2 financial advisors who have already presented us with financing proposals covering the 3 loan components above (all through the same bank). However, despite discussions with the financial advisors, we honestly do not yet fully understand exactly how the handling of the KFW 261 loan works. (we are slowly starting to wonder whether we are just incredibly slow to understand - or the financial advisors are not optimal at explaining - or perhaps both)
While one financial advisor pointed out that we can only finally sign the entire loan contract (with all 3 components) after submitting the Confirmation of Application (BZA) - the other financial advisor explained to us that it is also possible to conclude the loan contract without the Confirmation of Application (BZA), but the KFW 261 loan can only be disbursed after submitting the Confirmation of Application (BZA).
Our understanding is that a Confirmation of Application (BZA) requires a house inspection with the EE advisor/expert and can currently take several months including waiting times and creation. Creating a Confirmation of Application (BZA) before the conclusion of the purchase contract for the house is therefore not feasible. At the same time, concluding 2 loans at separate times (1x for house purchase / 1x for renovation a few months later) is also not reasonable/difficult to implement according to the financial advisors, since this would practically only be possible with the same bank (due to collateral through the land charge). Therefore, the entire financing would have to be arranged in one go.
Our question now would be: Is it possible to conclude such a loan contract, receive the money from Loan 1 & 2 already for the house purchase, and then submit the Confirmation of Application (BZA) afterwards and thus receive the amount from Loan 3? Or must the Confirmation of Application (BZA) already be available in order to conclude the overall contract at all? We especially want to have the security that the bank cannot "pull out" after proper submission of the Confirmation of Application (BZA) – because unfortunately, one increasingly hears that banks reject KFW loans under questionable arguments but at the same time refer to their own in-house loans. And especially in the current situation with enormous interest rate fluctuations, we simply need the security that the financing stays within the defined framework.
Maybe one of you is familiar with this or has completed a similar financing in the past – and can shed some light on the matter. We are incredibly grateful for any response!
Thank you and best regards
my partner and I are interested in acquiring and renovating a 1960s single-family house. Our desired financing would be a combination of 3 individual loans, all taken out through the same bank: Loan 1: Regular bank loan Loan 2: KFW 124 Home Ownership Program Loan 3: KFW 261 Residential Building (Goal: EE 70, but 85 would also be acceptable)
We would purchase the house with equity as well as Loan 1 & 2. The renovation would then be paid for with Loan 3 and additional equity (this equity for the renovation will not be part of the loan contract, i.e. officially we would only renovate for €150k [= full amount KFW 261]). We are currently in close contact with 2 financial advisors who have already presented us with financing proposals covering the 3 loan components above (all through the same bank). However, despite discussions with the financial advisors, we honestly do not yet fully understand exactly how the handling of the KFW 261 loan works. (we are slowly starting to wonder whether we are just incredibly slow to understand - or the financial advisors are not optimal at explaining - or perhaps both)
While one financial advisor pointed out that we can only finally sign the entire loan contract (with all 3 components) after submitting the Confirmation of Application (BZA) - the other financial advisor explained to us that it is also possible to conclude the loan contract without the Confirmation of Application (BZA), but the KFW 261 loan can only be disbursed after submitting the Confirmation of Application (BZA).
Our understanding is that a Confirmation of Application (BZA) requires a house inspection with the EE advisor/expert and can currently take several months including waiting times and creation. Creating a Confirmation of Application (BZA) before the conclusion of the purchase contract for the house is therefore not feasible. At the same time, concluding 2 loans at separate times (1x for house purchase / 1x for renovation a few months later) is also not reasonable/difficult to implement according to the financial advisors, since this would practically only be possible with the same bank (due to collateral through the land charge). Therefore, the entire financing would have to be arranged in one go.
Our question now would be: Is it possible to conclude such a loan contract, receive the money from Loan 1 & 2 already for the house purchase, and then submit the Confirmation of Application (BZA) afterwards and thus receive the amount from Loan 3? Or must the Confirmation of Application (BZA) already be available in order to conclude the overall contract at all? We especially want to have the security that the bank cannot "pull out" after proper submission of the Confirmation of Application (BZA) – because unfortunately, one increasingly hears that banks reject KFW loans under questionable arguments but at the same time refer to their own in-house loans. And especially in the current situation with enormous interest rate fluctuations, we simply need the security that the financing stays within the defined framework.
Maybe one of you is familiar with this or has completed a similar financing in the past – and can shed some light on the matter. We are incredibly grateful for any response!
Thank you and best regards