Assessment of financing project and budget accounting

  • Erstellt am 2024-04-10 20:44:53

nordanney

2024-04-11 15:56:20
  • #1
Only for the bank’s conditioning (which is reflected in the commission that KfW pays to the bank). Otherwise, it remains a loan in the risk assessment. You can accept it, but you shouldn’t, because the conditions are not really market-appropriate. Redemption through another bank can (and often will) be a real problem. Why? A simple example with fictitious numbers that are easy to calculate: Loan-to-value of the house €440K ==> the bank can calculate €264K as reliable collateral, no more is allowed Financing €300K bank with 1.5% repayment and 20 years fixed interest = remaining debt approx. €255K after 10 years Financing €100K KfW with 3% repayment and 10 years fixed interest = remaining debt approx. €65K after 10 years A third bank, which is supposed to replace the KfW loan, only has €9K collateral for a loan of €65K at this point. No bank simply agrees to that – if you even find one, it will hit you hard financially. The previous bank has it easier because it continues growing into the collateral.
 

CC35BS38

2024-04-12 09:10:55
  • #2

Then you can continue to use the current heating system. Either properly with a heat pump or you can save the money for the heating replacement with a heat pump that will be necessary in 10 years anyway. Forget about the solar. Either photovoltaics for electricity generation or save the money.
 

Brand0n

2024-04-12 11:17:03
  • #3


Thank you for the information. We will include the KfW component.

Currently, we have received a new offer with the following conditions:

We have received an offer for 354,000 €, which consists of two components:

1. Bank loan of 254,000 € at 4.19 % fixed interest for 30 years with 1.12 % repayment rate: 1123 € (37 years term)
2. KFW 124 of 100,000 € at 3.57 % fixed interest for 10 years with 1.51 % repayment rate: 423 € (35 years term)

Total rate: 1546 € (which means an additional burden of 9 euros and a longer theoretical term of 2 years, but 10 years longer fixed interest on the first component).

For comparison, there is an offer for the entire amount without KfW over a 20-year term:

1. Bank loan of 355,000 € at 4.28 % fixed interest for 20 years with 1.00 % repayment rate: 1562 € (39 years term)
 

ypg

2024-04-12 18:15:41
  • #4
And even lower repayment ... I wouldn't undertake financing under 2%. It's frustrating to look at the bank statement every year, where nothing positive changes for the first 18 years.
 

Similar topics
04.02.2013Bank loan and loan-to-value - is financing affordable?11
20.05.2013Question: 1% repayment and 10 years fixed interest rate. Will the house never be paid off?13
29.07.2014Fixed interest period and loan term for 10, 15, or 20 years?12
17.07.2015Uncertain due to financing43
07.04.2016New KfW conditions from 04/201674
17.11.2015Is financing for a semi-detached house feasible?20
18.01.2016Financing - where is the mistake?33
20.06.2016Error in financing?282
11.07.2016Interest rate fixation - financing assessment23
17.01.2017Is financing feasible? Finished house for the money?60
07.02.2017Evaluation of new construction financing17
06.04.2018Your assessment of our financing13
02.07.2019Financing with a 35-year fixed interest rate52
21.10.2019Financing with building savings loan + KfW + subordinated loan17
22.04.2020Single-family home financing through stocks39
01.07.2020Financing via KFW 55 or still from the bank?18
02.03.2021Financing a single-family house with 170 sqm30
13.04.2022Financing with residence abroad11
14.10.2023ISB and KfW funding: What is the effective monthly burden?11
09.06.2024Financing with children, subsidies, parental leave, probation period19

Oben