HansSP
2015-07-30 14:10:43
- #1
Hello everyone,
I have been reading here for a while as we initially wanted to build, but now have ended up with a single-family house built in 1996. We now have two offers or two variants and would like to hear your opinion on them.
Our situation is as follows:
Income:
He (32 years) 100% 3100€ net
She (28 years) 46% 980€ net
Child (1.5 years)
Equity approx. 80,000 €, of which 75,000 € will be used
Our project
House 285,000 €
Additional purchase costs 15,675 €
Renovation and furniture 36,030 €
Total: 336,705 €
Financing requirement: 336,705 € - 75,000 € = 262,000 €
We have spoken with the house bank, an insurer, and a financial broker. The offers from the broker clearly have the better interest rates and are as follows:
Variant 1:
Repayment loan 262,000 €
20 years at 2.60% nominal and 2.66% effective
Repayment 2.75%
1,168 € / month, residual debt after 20 years 76,277 €
Total payment without interest for follow-up financing: 356,617 €
Variant 2:
Repayment loan 262,000 €
12 years at 1.95% nominal and 1.97% effective
Repayment 1%
Years 1-12 = 644 € / month, residual debt after 12 years 180,177 €
Building savings contract:
24 years 3 months total term at 0.25% credit interest and 2.50% nominal
Years 1-12 = 507 €, from year 13 = 1,225 €
Total payment until full repayment of the loan: 345,958 €
Variant 2 is clearly cheaper in terms of costs, but is a combination with a building savings contract also the better option?
We do have some doubts regarding the allocation, whether there could be problems there. In addition, in variant 2, the loan and the building savings contract are with different providers. Could there be problems in the 12th year when the loan is redeemed with the building savings contract?
Your opinion on both variants, perhaps also your experiences, would be very helpful. I would like to thank you in advance for that.
Best regards, Hans
I have been reading here for a while as we initially wanted to build, but now have ended up with a single-family house built in 1996. We now have two offers or two variants and would like to hear your opinion on them.
Our situation is as follows:
Income:
He (32 years) 100% 3100€ net
She (28 years) 46% 980€ net
Child (1.5 years)
Equity approx. 80,000 €, of which 75,000 € will be used
Our project
House 285,000 €
Additional purchase costs 15,675 €
Renovation and furniture 36,030 €
Total: 336,705 €
Financing requirement: 336,705 € - 75,000 € = 262,000 €
We have spoken with the house bank, an insurer, and a financial broker. The offers from the broker clearly have the better interest rates and are as follows:
Variant 1:
Repayment loan 262,000 €
20 years at 2.60% nominal and 2.66% effective
Repayment 2.75%
1,168 € / month, residual debt after 20 years 76,277 €
Total payment without interest for follow-up financing: 356,617 €
Variant 2:
Repayment loan 262,000 €
12 years at 1.95% nominal and 1.97% effective
Repayment 1%
Years 1-12 = 644 € / month, residual debt after 12 years 180,177 €
Building savings contract:
24 years 3 months total term at 0.25% credit interest and 2.50% nominal
Years 1-12 = 507 €, from year 13 = 1,225 €
Total payment until full repayment of the loan: 345,958 €
Variant 2 is clearly cheaper in terms of costs, but is a combination with a building savings contract also the better option?
We do have some doubts regarding the allocation, whether there could be problems there. In addition, in variant 2, the loan and the building savings contract are with different providers. Could there be problems in the 12th year when the loan is redeemed with the building savings contract?
Your opinion on both variants, perhaps also your experiences, would be very helpful. I would like to thank you in advance for that.
Best regards, Hans