Recommendations for a construction company or general contractor near Offenburg/Lahr

  • Erstellt am 2021-09-02 23:19:31

Nikolan85

2021-09-02 23:19:31
  • #1
Hello,
We have completed construction planning up to service phase 4 with the architect and are waiting for the building permit.
Does anyone have experience with construction companies or general contractors [GU] in the Offenburg/Lahr area?
Another question: How long should detailed planning take? and Can a [GU] take over the detailed planning?
 

Ventreri

2021-09-03 01:04:01
  • #2
Hi, we are currently in the bidding phase with a company that already knocked 3 competitors out of the race in terms of price and quality. We are building turnkey with Poroton, brick by brick.

We will likely be building with them as well. Write to me, then I will send you my contact. Ventreri@icloud.com
 

11ant

2021-09-03 13:57:29
  • #3

Why do you want to work with the architect only up to the building permit, why shouldn’t he also manage construction?
I would not make a cut after service phase 4. Service phase 5 builds upon the previous phases 3 and 4. More thought goes into every plan than can be noted in the plan drawing. If you switch planners between service phases 4 and 5, these get lost. The result can be avoidable construction defects. General contractors produce a completely different quality of detailed planning, with a different objective. It is not desired to mention external sources of information here, but you can find in my profile under "Information" the way to contact me even as a newbie via private message.

There is a section "Experience with construction companies" where a variety of construction companies from all federal states and at least most regions are discussed.
 

11ant

2021-09-03 14:20:29
  • #4

P.S.: it is best to do a tender with the architect as well. However, such a tender cannot be properly based on performance phase 4 yet. General contractors can be a good choice; I would never exclude them from tenders. But firstly, it is not really a good idea to take general contractors only as a last resort out of the dilemma of not knowing anything about awarding contracts as a layperson. And secondly, without your own construction service specification, you inevitably end up, in my opinion rightly so, having to compare the construction service specifications of the various providers as a kind of punitive task. That is not a clever move.
 

Nikolan85

2021-09-08 09:49:19
  • #5
Hello and thank you very much for the response.
So, my architect himself recommended that he handles service phase 5 himself and then hands it over to the general contractor starting from service phase 6. He says he will not do the construction management and finds it sensible if the general contractor takes over everything.
The reason I also want to do service phase 5 with the general contractor is because of the time. My architect says he would manage service phase 5 at the earliest in 5-6 months. I know the work in service phase 5 is not little and therefore also 25% of the total sum. But 5-6 months is really long in my opinion. Therefore, the consideration was whether to do it directly with the general contractor.
 

11ant

2021-09-08 11:48:29
  • #6

My condolences on your choice of architect. Is he an artist, a slacker, or both? - in any case, he’s a joker if he wants to hand over to a general contractor starting from performance phase 6, because such a contractor is only appointed in performance phase 7. Performance phase 5 and performance phase 8 actually form a two-part series (never separate “st”, because it hurts him!). At least it’s a small gain that performance phase 5 is still done by the same person who did phases 1 to 4.

He shouldn’t have accepted the commission at all if he had no time for it. Nobody even needs five months for performance phase 5 if they have already been involved in the project from phases 1 to 4! (we’re not talking about a large hospital here, but a single-family house). In that respect, I understand your consideration, but I would point out that a general contractor does not perform performance phase 5 at all. They only produce the most rudimentary working plans; you can look forward to drywall instead of detailed planning. How did you contract with the architect so that he can now just drop out?
 

Similar topics
01.12.2016Construction company rejects change requests in construction service description and construction contract39
12.10.2017Cost of enclosed space. First draft discussed with architects27
27.10.2017Construction description by architects: Who has experience?13
11.07.2018Architects / Civil Engineer Service, Execution Plan, Scope26
29.01.2019Responsibility of the architect in case of KfW interest and further matters148
26.01.2019Building permit from 1931 not adhered to35
28.02.2019HOAI or why architects have no interest.....38
04.11.2019Is only part of the building permit enforceable? How long is the building permit valid?42
19.10.2019Building permit before construction financing?11
26.04.2020Are phases 1-4 sufficient? Or additionally 5?11
17.04.2020Construction Performance Description Formulation13
01.07.2020Complete offer from the architect? Is the price reasonable?54
15.08.2021Duration until the issuance of the building permit in BW57
06.01.2022Architects or prefab house cost calculation and next steps27
25.12.2021Planning phase: Building permit / Financing - Procedure14
22.05.2022Are performance phases 1-3 with the architect and lump sum offer somehow disadvantageous?19
18.01.2023Architect performance phase 1-4 - Which documents are required?33
25.06.2022Is the cost estimation by the architect realistic?39
12.02.2024Preliminary design via the architect and then tendering?16
13.11.2023Catalog house or free planning with architects12

Oben