So, my architect himself recommended that he handles performance phase 5 and then passes it on to the general contractor starting from performance phase 6. He says he will not do the construction management and thinks it makes sense if the general contractor takes over everything.
My condolences on your choice of architect. Is he an artist, a slacker, or both? - in any case, he’s a joker if he wants to hand over to a general contractor starting from performance phase 6, because such a contractor is only appointed in performance phase 7. Performance phase 5 and performance phase 8 actually form a two-part series (never separate “st”, because it hurts him!). At least it’s a small gain that performance phase 5 is still done by the same person who did phases 1 to 4.
The reason I also want to do performance phase 5 with the general contractor is because of time. My architect says he would only be able to complete performance phase 5 at the earliest in 5-6 months. I know the work in performance phase 5 is not little, hence also 25% of the total sum. But 5-6 months seems really long to me. Therefore, I considered whether to do it right away with the general contractor.
He shouldn’t have accepted the commission at all if he had no time for it. Nobody even needs five months for performance phase 5 if they have already been involved in the project from phases 1 to 4! (we’re not talking about a large hospital here, but a single-family house). In that respect, I understand your consideration, but I would point out that a general contractor does not perform performance phase 5 at all. They only produce the most rudimentary working plans; you can look forward to drywall instead of detailed planning. How did you contract with the architect so that he can now just drop out?