The question is not without significance! Basically, no one is protected from mistakes, not even when processing already provided data and values! Therefore, anyone can always make a mistake, and thus such coverage is also sensible! The contributions range between 1,000 EUR and ...... upwards depending on turnover and company size. It also becomes problematic if you are a career changer and have not studied or cannot prove a professional qualification. Currently, only 7 companies on the market still underwrite the risk anyway. It becomes even more problematic if you do not bill according to HOAI on a flat-rate basis. Many maintain useless contracts here, which precisely demand billing according to HOAI, and these people often do not know this, only in the event of performance :-(
Therefore... therefore, check who you bind yourself to or get a specialized broker like us for this purpose, who is liable to cover and secure correctly!
You should also know that when processing predefined data and numbers provided by an architect, there is always joint liability, even if the mistake is not yours. Didn’t know? No problem, we have explained it to you.
You should also know that you are personally liable for financial losses. This also means that even if you try to protect yourself through a legal entity and build a "shield" around yourself, financial losses can always extend to the private sphere and thus attack your private assets. Didn’t know? No problem, we have explained it to you.
As you can see, this insurance is only a compulsory insurance for architects. So why not for the building technician? Well, he does not plan directly ;-). He is only directly liable for the architect’s mistakes. But it also doesn’t help if the court declares partial fault/contributory negligence. Haven’t thought about that yet? No problem, we have informed you about it here.
You should also think about why this insurance is increasingly demanded from you as proof so that you receive a contract... because you do not need it by law? This explanation sounds strange and somehow illogical.
How is it again with private liability insurance.... also one that is not legally required! But why does the word "compulsory" appear everywhere in it? Advertising by the insurers?
Best regards T. Klenk