I would disagree there. I do not consider Option #1 viable. Why should he do exactly that? I find the terms of Option #3 just right.
With Option #3 he has the "problem" with the children. What if another one really comes and the woman can only work part-time for the next few years. In his place, I would talk to the advisor again to possibly get a mix of Option 2 and 3. With the equity, that can work and if another child comes, the woman can stay at home for two years.
You should please read the text carefully. This is often a big problem with the users. They only read half of the text and then give some strange answers. So please take your time and read the text of the thread creator carefully.
You should please read the text carefully. This is often a big problem with users. They only read half of the text and then give some strange answers. So please take your time and read the text of the thread creator carefully.
Sorry but I don't have the time for that. He could have simply summarized his post in a few words.