KFW70 or KFW55 experiences?

  • Erstellt am 2011-01-29 18:34:26

daugstin

2011-01-29 18:34:26
  • #1
Hello dear home builders,

I am sure this topic has already been discussed several times here. However, I did not find any entry so ad hoc and therefore I am asking my questions very specifically. We are currently looking around the market regarding house construction.

It seems that four providers have emerged with whom we could imagine building a house.

Now the question is whether we want/should build a Kfw70 or a Kfw55 house.

Which one should we go with? Also considering the upcoming Energy Saving Ordinance 2012... Does anyone already know what it will look like?

Is the additional cost worthwhile in connection with the savings in energy?

One house builder, Hanlo Häuser, basically builds KFW70 houses and says that is sufficient. According to him, the additional costs are not covered by the savings one has. The walls at Hanlo have a U-value of 0.13, which is quite good. However, the standard is only double-glazed windows. The standard heating system is an air heat pump.

Otherwise, Hanse Haus, Fingerhaus, and Bien-Zenker are still in the running. U-values are very similar there, as is heating. As for the windows, however, they build with triple glazing. Is double glazing really enough?

Unfortunately, we are very unsure about this and it would be great if you could give us some tips.

Thanks and regards

daugstin
 

€uro

2011-01-30 08:48:14
  • #2
Hello,

It is undoubtedly certain that energy prices (all energy sources) will rise significantly in the future. Looking back, one can see that annual price increases were sometimes significantly above the general inflation rate. This will certainly continue to be the case because energy for heating and hot water preparation is indispensable.
One slogan says: "The best energy is the energy that is not consumed or needed in the first place."
KfW standards always mean higher investments compared to the respective current Energy Saving Ordinance requirements. However, this is primarily from a primary energy perspective! This does not automatically mean economic feasibility for the builder.
In addition, it is not uncommon for Energy Saving Ordinance or KfW certificates to have been "beautified" and for the expectations of the builders regarding the final energy consumption often not to have been met in reality. Mostly due to insufficient efficiency of the building technology. Frequently, even the primary energy requirements of the certificate are not met.
The new Energy Saving Ordinance requirements will again significantly drive investments upwards!

Every GU/ GÜ (general contractor/general project manager) or BT (property developer) has its own sales and calculation concept. Naturally, the argumentation towards prospective buyers is subordinated to this. For example: If 80% of customers, for whatever reasons, request a KfW 70 or Energy Saving Ordinance house, the sales strategy is aligned accordingly. Those deviating from this preset direction as prospects usually have poor financial odds.
The U-value of individual components is certainly important, but overall, for an economic assessment, the total final energy balance is decisive. With heat generators, combo or compact units are often ordered cheaply and installed in large quantities on the market, although these often operate significantly less efficiently in practice compared to a modular setup.

Consultation and review of the planned building technology by a sales-independent expert before a contract is signed!
Best regards
 

parcus

2011-02-14 21:16:00
  • #3
According to the planned Energy Saving Ordinance 2012, one can already forget today's KfW70, as well as double glazing. Air heat pumps only make sense with efficient building envelopes. So between KfW55 and 3-liter house.
 

Bulla2000

2011-02-14 22:39:25
  • #4
You might want to involve other developers as well. As far as I know, the current KfW70 will soon become the Energy Saving Ordinance 2012 standard. You should make sure that the energy balance is not only beautified but effective and verifiable. For us, the desire for KfW70, for example, led to having both inter-rafter and under-rafter insulation in the roof. Triple-glazed windows are included anyway with [DEURA].
 

€uro

2011-02-15 08:06:06
  • #5
Air heat pumps do not necessarily require a particularly efficient building envelope. The decisive factors are the size of the heating surfaces and the heating medium temperatures in relation to the room heating loads.

Regards
 

parcus

2011-02-15 08:28:56
  • #6
@€uro

well, then install an air heat pump with its annual performance factor in old buildings with inefficient building envelopes and later explain the point when the meter spins.
 

Similar topics
10.05.2012Heating costs per year KfW55 - KfW70, building decision heating11
23.10.2016Thermal insulation, Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW 70 / 55 / 40 - Your experiences31
24.05.2015KfW 55 with wooden house - U-values: Wall 0.18 - Roof 0.1617
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
16.12.2015Is KfW55 worth it instead of KfW70 with an additional cost?16
17.12.2015Is T8 Poroton only significantly better than T12 in heating costs?14
09.05.2016Compliance with the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance with the following heating14
03.07.2016U-value of windows - differences15
25.06.2016How important is the U-value of interior walls?12
13.04.2017U-value of windows: 1.3 - is an upgrade worth it?16
16.07.2017Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW55, KFW40 or KFW40 Plus19
07.05.2020U-value outer wall 0.26 - is that okay?13
06.11.2018Ytong Energy Saving Regulation 25cm stone thickness allowed - Who has experience?17
27.11.2018Change heating "after" building permit?13
20.01.2020Build a multi-family house according to the Energy Saving Ordinance or KFW55?29
03.11.2020Single-family house with KfW55/controlled residential ventilation or Energy Saving Ordinance standard - experiences and opinions?22

Oben