KFW 55 according to reference values

  • Erstellt am 2016-01-19 23:12:59

Tentakel

2016-01-19 23:12:59
  • #1
Hello,

we are planning to build a single-family house in the summer. Now we are checking whether it is economical for us to achieve KFW-55. From 1.4., the simplified verification procedure according to reference values is sufficient for Kfw funding.

Does it even make sense to use the simplified verification procedure, or is it easier to achieve with a normal calculation anyway?

For windows and other transparent parts, a Uw < 0.90 W(m2K) is required. Am I correct in understanding that this is also necessary for roof windows? So far, I have not found anything in this area?

Thanks

Cheers Tentakel
 

wpic

2016-01-20 00:11:41
  • #2
The question can basically only be answered in connection with a specific building design.

In the simplified procedure, the U-values of the heat-transferring external components are given. In the full verification procedure, a complex calculation process, the components can be related to each other and offset against one another. The balance must correspond to the values specified by the Energy Saving Ordinance or the KfW funding programs. Therefore, during the design phase for the shell construction, the planner is potentially more flexible with the full procedure and can compensate disadvantages in one area with higher insulation in another.

The simplified thermal bridge verification according to Formblatt D is also associated with design specifications and restrictions that may negatively impact the design.

Whether you want to follow the specifications of the building services engineering with the designed system packages is up to you to decide.

Basically, every structural engineer who is also listed in the dena list as a building energy consultant / energy efficiency expert already provides the complete verification with their thermal protection proof, because they have the necessary and BAFA-approved calculation program.

These options are best discussed directly at the beginning of the collaboration with the architect and structural engineer. I advocate the complete verification procedure and the greater design freedoms.
 

Similar topics
19.06.2009Evaluation of the KfW 60 House Contract: Credit Check for House12
19.01.2013KfW 70 - which roller shutters in the new city villa?10
12.05.2014KfW 70 without ventilation system107
03.05.2011KfW loan okay or is there a cheaper option?10
21.08.2011Which heating system is suitable for our Kfw 70 house without a basement?15
10.07.2011Wall construction and insulation for Kfw 70 house, okay?19
07.10.2016Which heating is recommended for KfW 55?58
08.07.2012KfW 70 Ventilation / Exhaust System10
30.05.2012Massive house costs KFW 70 - Prefabricated house65
27.04.2014KFW 70 is not achieved, target values for gas condensing boilers23
01.06.2014KfW funding measures started late13
14.10.2014Surcharge KfW 7011
13.02.2015KfW Energy Efficient Building11
10.03.2015Is an exterior masonry wall KS 17.5 + 16 mineral wool + facing bricks with KfW 70 realizable?18
17.02.2015KFW funding sensible / Energy advisor, construction supervision?10
23.10.2016Thermal insulation, Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW 70 / 55 / 40 - Your experiences31
22.02.2015KfW loan as equity capital. Which bank does this?15
07.12.2015Heating question new building KFW 70 air heat pump + solar, ice storage?29
30.03.2016Energy consultant recommends KFW 55 - Recommended with solid construction?21

Oben