Saarschwabe
2016-05-21 18:54:58
- #1
Hello everyone,
we currently have a plot reserved that, as we have now learned, lies directly under an open land biotope.
The brief background:
We learned from an 84-year-old resident that in 1977 he leased an adjacent area of 250m² above his property (€50 per year). Subsequently, we inquired with the treasurer whether this would also be possible for us (building plot is two plots next door).
The treasurer was initially optimistic and said this would not be a problem. He would extend the lease boundary, so that an equally sized leased area of approximately 250m² would be created.
The problem:
However, today we received a letter from this very treasurer stating that this is "unfortunately a protected biotope" and that "other use is therefore not possible."
A look at the maps of the State Institute for Environment, Measurements and Nature Conservation BW shows that this is indeed not a FFH protected area, but it is an open land biotope. However, this open land biotope is only partially marked on the lease area in question (!).
The question:
My question now is whether it would be possible
a) to obtain some kind of exemption permit, or
b) to lease the area merely as a play meadow for the children, with the obligation to carry out no cultivation or the like, or
c) at least to lease the small section that is not designated as an open land biotope.
I would like to approach the treasurer with the same questions, but I am eager to hear your opinions beforehand.
Thank you very much for your answers!
we currently have a plot reserved that, as we have now learned, lies directly under an open land biotope.
The brief background:
We learned from an 84-year-old resident that in 1977 he leased an adjacent area of 250m² above his property (€50 per year). Subsequently, we inquired with the treasurer whether this would also be possible for us (building plot is two plots next door).
The treasurer was initially optimistic and said this would not be a problem. He would extend the lease boundary, so that an equally sized leased area of approximately 250m² would be created.
The problem:
However, today we received a letter from this very treasurer stating that this is "unfortunately a protected biotope" and that "other use is therefore not possible."
A look at the maps of the State Institute for Environment, Measurements and Nature Conservation BW shows that this is indeed not a FFH protected area, but it is an open land biotope. However, this open land biotope is only partially marked on the lease area in question (!).
The question:
My question now is whether it would be possible
a) to obtain some kind of exemption permit, or
b) to lease the area merely as a play meadow for the children, with the obligation to carry out no cultivation or the like, or
c) at least to lease the small section that is not designated as an open land biotope.
I would like to approach the treasurer with the same questions, but I am eager to hear your opinions beforehand.
Thank you very much for your answers!