C.beckmann1986
2022-09-14 11:45:35
- #1
Hello everyone,
I need your advice on a topic that is currently very annoying me.
We moved into our new house at the end of last year (new development via a developer). As requested, the interior doors were not installed at the time of handover but were to be installed by us afterward (after completing our own work).
Accordingly, we installed the interior doors ourselves at the beginning of this year, as the last trade (the rooms were painted, the floor laid). I also confirmed the apparently proper installation of all doors with the installer.
A few months later, we have now noticed that one interior door (from the living room to the basement) has warped significantly. The door fits flush in the lock but visibly sticks out at the top and bottom (like a U – see photo).
We reported this via the developer’s defect portal, and the matter was passed on to the door company. Without even looking at the door or at least consulting with us, the defect was coldly rejected.
Reason:
The door was obviously in order when installed, and a factory defect could be ruled out because only one door was affected. They assume improper handling by the customer (wrong storage of the door, failure to comply with climatic conditions, etc.) and therefore are not responsible. A door warping of up to 4 mm is also permissible.
Only after our renewed request did someone from the company finally come out to at least take a look on site. The installer found a warping of 9 mm as proven. Nevertheless, the defect is still being rejected with the above justification.
Our arguments that it is completely unrealistic to permanently remove an interior door in a new building (where all work is now completed), especially the basement door with a small child in the household, or whatever else one might do with it, were completely ignored.
We were simply offered a new interior door at our own expense.
The developer, of course, immediately sided with this statement and also rejected the defect.
Now I am a bit at a loss. Here it is a case of one statement against another, whereas I believe that there is indeed a verifiable defect and that we are definitely blameless, especially since the other 13 interior doors are not warped in this way.
Can the company still so easily dodge responsibility, and are we stuck with the damage? Every other trade has examined the reported defects and also repaired them accordingly.
I would appreciate any experience you might want to share.
Many thanks,
Christian

I need your advice on a topic that is currently very annoying me.
We moved into our new house at the end of last year (new development via a developer). As requested, the interior doors were not installed at the time of handover but were to be installed by us afterward (after completing our own work).
Accordingly, we installed the interior doors ourselves at the beginning of this year, as the last trade (the rooms were painted, the floor laid). I also confirmed the apparently proper installation of all doors with the installer.
A few months later, we have now noticed that one interior door (from the living room to the basement) has warped significantly. The door fits flush in the lock but visibly sticks out at the top and bottom (like a U – see photo).
We reported this via the developer’s defect portal, and the matter was passed on to the door company. Without even looking at the door or at least consulting with us, the defect was coldly rejected.
Reason:
The door was obviously in order when installed, and a factory defect could be ruled out because only one door was affected. They assume improper handling by the customer (wrong storage of the door, failure to comply with climatic conditions, etc.) and therefore are not responsible. A door warping of up to 4 mm is also permissible.
Only after our renewed request did someone from the company finally come out to at least take a look on site. The installer found a warping of 9 mm as proven. Nevertheless, the defect is still being rejected with the above justification.
Our arguments that it is completely unrealistic to permanently remove an interior door in a new building (where all work is now completed), especially the basement door with a small child in the household, or whatever else one might do with it, were completely ignored.
We were simply offered a new interior door at our own expense.
The developer, of course, immediately sided with this statement and also rejected the defect.
Now I am a bit at a loss. Here it is a case of one statement against another, whereas I believe that there is indeed a verifiable defect and that we are definitely blameless, especially since the other 13 interior doors are not warped in this way.
Can the company still so easily dodge responsibility, and are we stuck with the damage? Every other trade has examined the reported defects and also repaired them accordingly.
I would appreciate any experience you might want to share.
Many thanks,
Christian