danielohondo
2021-02-13 18:29:45
- #1
Hello everyone,
we have the case that we want to buy a plot of land from the city. However, it is not clear how we should implement this. The plot costs 90 thousand plus additional costs. We can raise 60 thousand and the additional costs. Only the remaining 30 thousand should be financed. Our house bank does not want to offer us a variable financing under 50 thousand and in general, you cannot find a bank that will do this.
This results in 2 possibilities: 1. Finance 50 thousand variable at a bank and then repay when we have the financing for the house construction. 2. Get an installment loan with a 2-year term and repay as soon as the financing for the house construction is secured.
I see an advantage in option 1 that we have enough time to decide on a general contractor. The disadvantage is the mortgage of a bank and the resulting notary costs for the house financing with another bank.
In option 2 I see the advantage of no mortgage. Can take my time with the general contractor. Disadvantages are Schufa entry (possibly the score will drop?). Repaying the loan after 6 months, for example, could cost us something. Amount unknown.
There is also the possibility to finance everything with the house bank, but we are under full pressure to find a general contractor quickly and pay for the plot. The city sets the deadline, but it is not yet known.
What do you think?
we have the case that we want to buy a plot of land from the city. However, it is not clear how we should implement this. The plot costs 90 thousand plus additional costs. We can raise 60 thousand and the additional costs. Only the remaining 30 thousand should be financed. Our house bank does not want to offer us a variable financing under 50 thousand and in general, you cannot find a bank that will do this.
This results in 2 possibilities: 1. Finance 50 thousand variable at a bank and then repay when we have the financing for the house construction. 2. Get an installment loan with a 2-year term and repay as soon as the financing for the house construction is secured.
I see an advantage in option 1 that we have enough time to decide on a general contractor. The disadvantage is the mortgage of a bank and the resulting notary costs for the house financing with another bank.
In option 2 I see the advantage of no mortgage. Can take my time with the general contractor. Disadvantages are Schufa entry (possibly the score will drop?). Repaying the loan after 6 months, for example, could cost us something. Amount unknown.
There is also the possibility to finance everything with the house bank, but we are under full pressure to find a general contractor quickly and pay for the plot. The city sets the deadline, but it is not yet known.
What do you think?