ah-1986
2016-10-31 13:53:19
- #1
Hello everyone,
since legal protection insurance does not cover construction, I am trying to get information this way before I confront the general contractor like a pushover.
The following situation:
We had our old house demolished and a new one built on the same plot. According to the responsible expert from the city, the old sewage shaft could have been used without any doubt. In the contract, it was stipulated that the sewage would be connected to the existing sewer and a sewage application would be submitted by the general contractor. However, this application was forgotten; the city had not even been aware until last Thursday that the old house was gone. The new house is aligned with the street to be barrier-free in old age. However, the sanitation technician somehow mismeasured, and the new sewage pipes are 23 cm too deep. If it had been measured correctly, it would have been done differently. Thus, the old shaft can no longer be used. If the application had been submitted immediately, the city would have told us before setting the foundation slab that we would need a new shaft for a flush house and that we could use the old one if we had accepted two steps; but we couldn’t make that choice. In addition, during all the planning discussions with the general contractor, we were only told that we would have to cover the costs of a new shaft (€2500) if the old one was no longer usable, which it was.
Now my question: do we have to pay the €2500, or is the dilemma the responsibility of the sanitation technician and the general contractor, and must they be liable?
Best regards
since legal protection insurance does not cover construction, I am trying to get information this way before I confront the general contractor like a pushover.
The following situation:
We had our old house demolished and a new one built on the same plot. According to the responsible expert from the city, the old sewage shaft could have been used without any doubt. In the contract, it was stipulated that the sewage would be connected to the existing sewer and a sewage application would be submitted by the general contractor. However, this application was forgotten; the city had not even been aware until last Thursday that the old house was gone. The new house is aligned with the street to be barrier-free in old age. However, the sanitation technician somehow mismeasured, and the new sewage pipes are 23 cm too deep. If it had been measured correctly, it would have been done differently. Thus, the old shaft can no longer be used. If the application had been submitted immediately, the city would have told us before setting the foundation slab that we would need a new shaft for a flush house and that we could use the old one if we had accepted two steps; but we couldn’t make that choice. In addition, during all the planning discussions with the general contractor, we were only told that we would have to cover the costs of a new shaft (€2500) if the old one was no longer usable, which it was.
Now my question: do we have to pay the €2500, or is the dilemma the responsibility of the sanitation technician and the general contractor, and must they be liable?
Best regards