Glyphosate from the neighbor. Spraying boundaries to residential buildings

Just talk. But leave the paragraphs in the basement, that only provokes unnecessarily. A farmer can be a great buddy. They have access to lots of helpers when a tree root needs to be removed, the old hedge needs to go ...

Yes, the farmers are all great. But not this one. We have 3 farmers as neighbors. 2 are great. But not this one. But it doesn't matter, because we hardly see him anyway. And he no longer works his field himself, but the cooperative does.

But I have to know the legal basics if I want to talk to someone. Otherwise, I go there and don't even know if I'm right at all.

Talking, you call that? Aha. Does your neighbor actually have children?

Oh, so you can't read beyond that, then you're exhausted. Alright. Otherwise, you would also know that the neighbor is 80 years old - his children, if he has any, are probably around 50? Who cares?

Well, it doesn't seem to be any better with me than with you. At least it doesn't seem like you have much to do with cross-references either. After all, you're not really into "children".

But the thing is, nobody here (myself included) wants anything bad for you. At worst, someone here just wants nothing from you. But that's no reason to get personal right away. You seem to be a kind of person who has their own, special, not necessarily generally accepted way about them.

Either the majority or you yourself have to know how to deal with that. Some can, some can't.

The fact is, following your accounts, the other person made a mistake. According to your version, no lawbook is needed for that. Even the last farmer* (* insert profession of your choice) should be clear that he may not spray someone else's land. You have to find out together what caused it. You don't need to know any laws for that either. You notice pretty quickly whether this conversation brings anything. If not, this forum won't be able to help you anymore anyway.

Therefore, I generally recommend the appeal for moderation to you. Here and elsewhere.

Well, for me, it doesn’t seem any better than for you. At least it also doesn’t seem like you have much to do with cross-references. After all, you’re not really into "children".

So we’re totally digressing here and it’s completely unimportant, but this has nothing to do with cross-references. There is no content-related connection, nothing at all. You just wanted to be provocative. :)

But the fact is, no one here (myself included) wishes you any harm.

Yeah, yeah. ;)

The fact is, according to your stories, the other person made a mistake. For that, you don’t need a law book, if your version is correct.

I think the problem is: For me, glyphosate is carcinogenic. So comparable to, for example, asbestos. Now, if your neighbor soaked 5m² of your land with asbestos slag, would you calmly say: "Uh hello, you sprayed a bit over there"?

Not really, right? That would already be unpleasant if your children still want to play there or you had planned your carrot patch there. You would want to know if you can always avoid that in the future with solid arguments, right?
And that’s how I feel about glyphosate.

What do you actually want to achieve with the conversation? Compensation? Or to present or reinforce your position again?