kmehl
2017-08-22 16:00:13
- #1
Hello everyone,
the purchase of a solid single-family house built in 1960 is upcoming.
It has been renovated repeatedly. Therefore, it is in relatively good condition.
Price: €260,000
The only drawback from my point of view: the oil heating system is from 1993 and thus somewhat older.
Ultimately, nothing necessarily needs to be done.
But.... we are considering possibly including the renovation of the heating system in the loan (switching to a more modern oil condensing boiler) and maybe repainting the exterior or other smaller things.
Okay, the bathrooms are also not exactly to our taste, but we could live with them.
In any case... we estimate the possible renovation costs at around €40,000 (heating + painting the facade + x).
Now to the actual question:
Should we....
a) rather plan the renovation costs directly, meaning take out a larger loan (€300,000)
b) fix the loan for the house without renovation costs and take out a second loan for the renovation costs (€260,000 + €40,000); is something like this even sensible?
c) plan only the house loan, no renovation, better do it later, for example when the heating system breaks down and then also do the facade, etc. (€260,000)
I wonder how sensible the various options are. As mentioned, it is not strictly necessary to tackle the renovation immediately. But I wonder if it might be worthwhile to already factor it in to be relatively certain to have peace of mind in the coming years, at least regarding heating and facade. The second concern I have refers to what happens if you only address it later, for example in 3-4 years: how is it then with another loan? Would you easily get another renovation loan of €40,000 in addition to the main loan still running? Would there be worse conditions because of that? How is something like this handled in practice?
I would be very grateful for tips and opinions.
Regards
K. Mehl
the purchase of a solid single-family house built in 1960 is upcoming.
It has been renovated repeatedly. Therefore, it is in relatively good condition.
Price: €260,000
The only drawback from my point of view: the oil heating system is from 1993 and thus somewhat older.
Ultimately, nothing necessarily needs to be done.
But.... we are considering possibly including the renovation of the heating system in the loan (switching to a more modern oil condensing boiler) and maybe repainting the exterior or other smaller things.
Okay, the bathrooms are also not exactly to our taste, but we could live with them.
In any case... we estimate the possible renovation costs at around €40,000 (heating + painting the facade + x).
Now to the actual question:
Should we....
a) rather plan the renovation costs directly, meaning take out a larger loan (€300,000)
b) fix the loan for the house without renovation costs and take out a second loan for the renovation costs (€260,000 + €40,000); is something like this even sensible?
c) plan only the house loan, no renovation, better do it later, for example when the heating system breaks down and then also do the facade, etc. (€260,000)
I wonder how sensible the various options are. As mentioned, it is not strictly necessary to tackle the renovation immediately. But I wonder if it might be worthwhile to already factor it in to be relatively certain to have peace of mind in the coming years, at least regarding heating and facade. The second concern I have refers to what happens if you only address it later, for example in 3-4 years: how is it then with another loan? Would you easily get another renovation loan of €40,000 in addition to the main loan still running? Would there be worse conditions because of that? How is something like this handled in practice?
I would be very grateful for tips and opinions.
Regards
K. Mehl