kanzler753
2010-08-20 19:52:17
- #1
Hello everyone,
we are not quite sure how many cm of insulation with the rigid foam boards makes sense.
One builder says that the exterior wall accounts for 40% of the total exterior area of the house and recommends (in addition to reinforcing the roof insulation) also strengthening the exterior insulation.
The background was that we actually wanted to replace the 17.5 cm Poroton bricks with ETICS from the construction specification with 36 cm solid brick or with 24 cm aerated concrete with ETICS. Our builder (Heinz von Heiden, Hesse) advised us to save the surcharge on aerated concrete and rather invest in stronger insulation for the exterior walls. Is Heinz von Heiden's objection correct?
In the construction specification, the insulation boards of the exterior walls have a thickness of 16 cm and the exterior wall has a U-value of 0.19.
With an additional cost of about 2,500 euros, we would get a 24 cm exterior insulation with a U-value of 0.14...
Now we are having talks with several builders and the one from Helma thinks that is nonsense. Only the roof is important and should be reinforced, as the interior space of the house decreases with thicker boards.
Question: How do you see the question of the THICKNESS of the exterior insulation with rigid foam boards (no alternatives, it is really only about the thickness of the boards and whether the efficiency gain justifies the surcharge)
Thank you in advance to all helpers
we are not quite sure how many cm of insulation with the rigid foam boards makes sense.
One builder says that the exterior wall accounts for 40% of the total exterior area of the house and recommends (in addition to reinforcing the roof insulation) also strengthening the exterior insulation.
The background was that we actually wanted to replace the 17.5 cm Poroton bricks with ETICS from the construction specification with 36 cm solid brick or with 24 cm aerated concrete with ETICS. Our builder (Heinz von Heiden, Hesse) advised us to save the surcharge on aerated concrete and rather invest in stronger insulation for the exterior walls. Is Heinz von Heiden's objection correct?
In the construction specification, the insulation boards of the exterior walls have a thickness of 16 cm and the exterior wall has a U-value of 0.19.
With an additional cost of about 2,500 euros, we would get a 24 cm exterior insulation with a U-value of 0.14...
Now we are having talks with several builders and the one from Helma thinks that is nonsense. Only the roof is important and should be reinforced, as the interior space of the house decreases with thicker boards.
Question: How do you see the question of the THICKNESS of the exterior insulation with rigid foam boards (no alternatives, it is really only about the thickness of the boards and whether the efficiency gain justifies the surcharge)
Thank you in advance to all helpers