Bob79
2019-03-28 22:25:43
- #1
Hello everyone,
We are currently planning the construction of our single-family house. Originally, a single-layer exterior masonry in the ground floor (EG) and upper floor (OG) made of thermal insulation bricks with a lambda value of 0.08 W/(mK) was planned. However, due to a preliminary static calculation, a partially two-layer construction was planned in parts of the ground floor using a concrete wall with insulation (WDVS). In the now final static calculation, it was found that even more areas in the ground floor require higher strength. Our general contractor has now informed us that he has decided to build the entire ground floor again as a single layer using thermal insulation bricks with a lambda value of 0.08 but with higher brick strength, at least 2.9 MN/m² (e.g. filled object brick). The upper floor remains as planned without filling. What do you think? Are there advantages or disadvantages compared to the previously planned concrete with insulation variant?
We are currently planning the construction of our single-family house. Originally, a single-layer exterior masonry in the ground floor (EG) and upper floor (OG) made of thermal insulation bricks with a lambda value of 0.08 W/(mK) was planned. However, due to a preliminary static calculation, a partially two-layer construction was planned in parts of the ground floor using a concrete wall with insulation (WDVS). In the now final static calculation, it was found that even more areas in the ground floor require higher strength. Our general contractor has now informed us that he has decided to build the entire ground floor again as a single layer using thermal insulation bricks with a lambda value of 0.08 but with higher brick strength, at least 2.9 MN/m² (e.g. filled object brick). The upper floor remains as planned without filling. What do you think? Are there advantages or disadvantages compared to the previously planned concrete with insulation variant?