Execution quality of aerated concrete masonry

  • Erstellt am 2014-05-25 21:48:15

Käfer

2014-05-25 21:48:15
  • #1
Hello everyone! I am interested in whether there are standards, guidelines, etc. for the execution of masonry work made of aerated concrete. I have attached a few photos of spots that caught my attention. Maybe I am mistaken, but I noticed some damaged bricks and interruptions in the joint bed. What would be tolerable and what would not? The Käfer
 

Bauexperte

2014-05-26 08:14:46
  • #2
Hello,


Of course there are; nothing in Germany happens without standards


Aerated concrete is a soft stone, so it can happen that it is damaged during transport or assembly. As long as suitable filling material is used, thermal bridges are avoided.

In the attachment you will find a picture from one of our current construction sites. Here you can clearly see that stone breakage cannot be avoided (the dark gray areas in the masonry have been filled).

Rhenish regards
 

wadenkneifer

2014-05-26 11:17:56
  • #3
Hello,

as Bauexperte has already written: Breaks cannot be avoided and they are unproblematic if they are properly sealed with the right material.

When looking at the pictures from you and from Bauexperte, I notice that Bauexperte worked more neatly/carefully. I have noticed something similar when looking at various construction projects in the area. Some look more like Epis, others (alarmingly many) look like in your photos and partly have large, unfilled holes between the stones.

Answer from a "sales advisor" during a shell construction inspection: That does not matter, it will be closed during plastering. Here, there were sometimes joints of 2 cm between the stones. It should not be like that...

Many greetings

Michael
 

Käfer

2014-05-31 18:51:18
  • #4
Thanks first of all. I will upload a few more photos of concrete lintels and ask for comments. Can it stay like this and does it bear the load? What "bearing length" in relation to the length does the regulations require?



 

lastdrop

2014-05-31 19:32:44
  • #5
That definitely seems too little to me ...
 

wadenkneifer

2014-05-31 20:46:19
  • #6
Moin,

that looks very little. How much is that? 5 cm? I can't provide any specifications on that, but I would consider the overlap measurement for the bricks (should be at least 10 cm, if I remember correctly) as a minimum requirement. Even if I look at our lintels in this regard...

Best regards

Michael
 

Similar topics
19.10.2010Poroton T14 or aerated concrete climate standard PP211
25.02.2013Aerated concrete or Poroton or sand-lime brick?10
23.08.201317.5 Poroton + 16 WDVS or 36.5 Aerated concrete19
06.02.2017Insulate new construction 36.5 aerated concrete?60
05.08.2014New single-family house (KFW70)/aerated concrete vs. sand-lime brick/what to use?71
28.02.2015Cost difference between KSK+WDVS and aerated concrete11
15.12.2019Aerated concrete exterior wall vs. Energy Saving Ordinance13
23.07.2015Walls made of aerated concrete27
06.04.2017Construction method: 36.5 cm aerated concrete or 17.5 cm + 14 cm external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS)37
04.08.2017Exterior walls made of aerated concrete, interior walls made of calcium silicate brick - yes or no?11
29.04.2018Bungalow made of aerated concrete - experiences? DIY beginner questions!34
01.02.2021Y-Tong (aerated concrete) - quality building material? (sound insulation!)91
08.05.2019Aerated concrete or sand-lime brick with external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS) made of polystyrene29
22.07.2019Aerated concrete or Poroton for single-family house19
13.12.2019Aerated concrete 42.5 lambda 0.08 or 0.0932
23.12.2020Porous concrete solid roof as a tent roof for a city villa31
09.04.2022Building material selection: Brick or aerated concrete - Sound assessment on the topic26
24.01.202542.5 cm aerated concrete and 400 cm wide windows and venetian blinds18

Oben