Estimated costs used house

  • Erstellt am 2013-02-07 15:01:56

DaveS

2013-02-07 15:01:56
  • #1
Hope the topic fits here somewhat:

We are interested in a house built in 1998, generally in good condition. 182 m2, detached. On the outskirts of town.

Now about the price: The seller wants 475 K€ - at the year of construction it cost him (without exterior facilities, wall and floor coverings) 730 K DM.

My question now is - without going further into details - is this price justified:

If I convert everything into € and apply about 2% inflation per year, I come to a price of about 503 K€, which the house would cost today.

But then there is the age-related depreciation? How can I calculate that? Based only on the above figures, it seems too expensive to me.

Daves
 

nordanney

2013-02-07 15:12:13
  • #2
Hello, you don't have to calculate. The house has exactly the value (regardless of original construction costs or a current market value) that you are willing to pay. Supply and demand also determine the market here. If it is worth the price to you, then pay it. If not, someone else will do, or it is too high for others as well.
 

Musketier

2013-02-07 15:35:34
  • #3
If I were you, I would consult an expert. They can then tell you whether the house is worth what the seller is asking. They can also provide reasons for possible price negotiations.

To get an initial overview, you can google standard construction costs.
For some houses that are currently being foreclosed, the expert reports are published online at w w w . zvg-portal . de.
If you find a house there with a similar year of construction, you can look at the calculations for the standard construction costs and depreciation. Maybe that will help already. However, not every house has the complete report included.

Of course, these are only theoretical figures. An actual value can, as mentioned above, only be obtained from an expert.
 

DaveS

2013-02-07 16:03:29
  • #4
Hello nordanney,

that is of course
(a) correct
but also
(b) totally subjective.

One should not completely detach from the sober market.

Daves
 

DaveS

2013-02-07 16:05:41
  • #5
Hello Musketeer,

I have already tried that - the problem is that the table from 2000 contains such large bandwidths that everything comes out ranging from outrageously expensive to super cheap.

There is also a certain subjective factor involved in how one evaluates the equipment.

That's why I tried it based on the purchase price at the time.

Daves
 

nordanney

2013-02-07 16:18:39
  • #6
Hello DaveS, you are of course right that it is subjective. However, the market is you (and all other house buyers). You will hardly find truly comparable houses. I work in the real estate (financing sector) and can tell you that even appraisers have very large valuation ranges in their reports. An appraisal, for example, costs a lot of money at the appraiser committee. In the end, gut feeling and budget decide about the real estate investment. Although that is not entirely correct: decisive are - also for future value development - location, location, and location!
 

Similar topics
04.11.2012Expert despite TÜV approval?13
01.10.2013Construction company would rather not have an assessor11
14.12.2015Expert discovers defects in the basement. What to do?11
08.06.2016Decision on land purchase, geological report, pressure with purchase contract / review20
30.06.2016Existing property - appraiser, financing, negotiating...17
01.08.2018Construction company demands extra costs due to cooperation with appraiser21
04.01.2023Retaining wall 2 m high without static report?10
04.09.2020Handling standard land values/reports conversion17
01.11.2020Rough cost estimate house renovation built in '73 - appraiser17
20.10.2021Renovation of a 1960s house: Questionable expert recommendations?92
17.03.2022DSL Bank takes a long time processing, now also sending surveyors for 200k22
10.08.2022Hydrogeological Report - Geothermal Energy, Air-Water Heat Pump or Ice Storage?26
07.05.2023Is it sensible for the expert to inspect the base plate?55

Oben