Super-Erna
2017-07-18 18:48:48
- #1
Hello first of all,
I have a small problem. We are currently building with a developer and during the last inspection we discovered something (see picture).
According to the site manager, a stone was missing and it was rebuilt using good old bricklayer style.
It is obvious that the stone broke off and was rebuilt.
When asking the site manager, we were told it stays that way and is completely legitimate.
Is this statement correct? Can we accept it as is or is it completely wrong?
It is a KfW55 house.
We would be very grateful for helpful answers

I have a small problem. We are currently building with a developer and during the last inspection we discovered something (see picture).
According to the site manager, a stone was missing and it was rebuilt using good old bricklayer style.
It is obvious that the stone broke off and was rebuilt.
When asking the site manager, we were told it stays that way and is completely legitimate.
Is this statement correct? Can we accept it as is or is it completely wrong?
It is a KfW55 house.
We would be very grateful for helpful answers