Cooling law amendment is being promoted - experiences?

  • Erstellt am 2021-06-16 13:23:13

Reltaw2021

2021-06-16 13:23:13
  • #1
EDIT: Unfortunately, I am unable to attach the PDF. I will try again later!


Dear congregation!

As you can see from the attachment, a legal change has been enacted.

With my layman's understanding, I would describe the legislative amendments in the attachment as relevant for private construction projects. Although the title refers to renovations and not new buildings, the legal text then only concerns permanently occupied residential houses—thus excluding churches, commercial enterprises, clubhouses, etc.
Why do I expect this to improve our position? Because similar to the previous regulation concerning craftsman invoices for household-related services, which reduce taxes, the circle of "specialist companies" has now been expanded to include several professional groups that are significantly more distant from the previous ones. In the future, invoices from window builders and even well diggers (!) can be submitted to the tax office, provided their trade serves energy/heat savings. The possible specialist companies are listed by name in the law.
Therefore, I suggest that invoicing for typical work serving energy efficiency be prepared separately as much as possible, similar to the fictional invoice for the KfW energy consultant employed in the house of the house builder.
The second major change, which will take effect from 01.04.2021: The COOLING (active and passive) of living spaces is now also eligible for support.

Has anyone already made use of this legislative amendment? Did anyone know about it and can speak from experience? I think the first beneficiaries of the new legal situation will only emerge in March 2022. But maybe one of those assembled here, as a tax specialist, has already attended training, etc. on this. My house-building company certainly didn’t know anything about it, which gives me the impression that one can only benefit from the new law through personal initiative. Because apart from us home builders and tax advisors, no one benefits from it.


Regards, Reltaw
 

11ant

2021-06-16 13:31:33
  • #2
01.04. aka "April first". April Fools' jokes are traditionally done fresh, you don’t take them out of cooling again after almost eleven weeks – regardless of whether the latter is funded or not ;-)
 

T_im_Norden

2021-06-16 13:33:27
  • #3
Air conditioning manufacturers like to write this, but if you read more closely, it is about heat pumps with a cooling function. I have not yet found any subsidies for private residential buildings explicitly for air conditioning units on any site.
 

T_im_Norden

2021-06-16 13:52:16
  • #4
More precisely, it is about air-to-air heat pumps.
 

Reltaw2021

2021-06-16 17:34:34
  • #5
But even if it is "only" about heat pumps, it would be progress for me and welcome.
 

11ant

2021-06-16 18:17:46
  • #6
You could also insert external links here, but you are not allowed to :-(
 

Similar topics
14.02.2024Bafa funding for heat pumps will be discontinued as of 31.12.2020.510
24.03.2021No internet in the new development area - DigiNetz law?28
14.05.2023How did you install your heat pumps?15
08.02.2022How complicated are heat pumps in practical operation?78
09.04.2023Planned throttling of wallboxes and heat pumps34
30.07.2023Heat pump theft protection - Covered by building insurance?36
27.04.2024Replacing electric radiators with inverter air conditioners13
13.03.2025Structural assessment of the slots for electrical and air conditioning systems12

Oben