Can two plots be combined despite an easement?

Hello dear forum community,

we have bought two "old" plots of land.
One "large" one which also includes the building window for our house and a small one next to it.

The large one is completely free of entries in the land register. However, the small one has a right of ENBW for a mast of an electrical overhead line. This itself does not bother us.

Our problem now is this. One plot is located on Street A, the other belongs to Street B. If I have understood everything correctly so far, we now have to pay for Street A when it is renovated and also for Street B. Since we own a plot in both.
Therefore, our idea was to combine the two plots. Then only Street A would apply to us. Is this still correct?

Our concern now is the line. I would suspect this easement will then be valid on both plots. Can someone confirm or refute this assumption?

I hope it is clear what I want.
If not, I will gladly try to explain it again.

Therefore, our idea was to merge the two plots of land. Then only Street A would be valid for us. Is that still correct?

It remains situated on both streets.

Our concern now is the easement. I would assume this easement will then be valid for both plots of land.

If it is not related to a defined strip, it naturally also applies to the "new" / "combined" parcel.

The size of the plot of land adjacent to the street is included as a decisive factor in the fee assessments for the road expansion statute that I have seen so far.

Therefore, it even becomes more expensive if you merge the plots of land.

My employer once had to make a street golden for a municipality, meanwhile we keep the plots of land adjacent to streets small :)

A plot of land is only listed on paper as being adjacent to the street. In practice, it is completely surrounded by other plots of land. Would any costs then be allocated to this plot of land at all?