globetrotter
2015-05-10 18:13:25
- #1
Hello everyone,
in the meantime, we have reserved the plot mentioned in and are dealing more intensively with the construction of the 3-story building (but more about that in another thread). The housing company from which we would buy the plot had a multi-family house that stood there demolished. The cellar was also excavated and refilled. However, the walls (I assume the exterior, or all load-bearing?) were not part of this and probably remained. Buyers of other plots, whose demolition of the houses located there was also commissioned at that time, had already experienced the surprise that some construction debris was deposited there. Therefore, they advised us to have a soil survey (or percussion survey => what is that?) conducted (already during the current reservation phase). What should be considered in this? As far as I have read, a normal soil survey does not necessarily include a contaminated sites report. In this case, that would certainly also be sensible, right? This is generally recommended here, also because the arsenic and heavy metal content is often elevated due to the historical mining. So far, of course, we still have no (concrete) ideas about exactly where our house will stand (but quite precisely, since we are supposed to attach directly to the multi-family house on the neighboring plot). Does it make sense to clarify this first, in order to then carry out the drillings exactly on their outline, or does it ultimately not depend on the exact meter and we could already commission this? The next question concerns the neighboring plot. As far as I have read, in the case of a boundary development, the consent of the owner of the neighboring plot must be obtained. Is this also to be obtained in our case, even if the city (without a development plan) prescribes the closed building style?
Many thanks in advance.
in the meantime, we have reserved the plot mentioned in and are dealing more intensively with the construction of the 3-story building (but more about that in another thread). The housing company from which we would buy the plot had a multi-family house that stood there demolished. The cellar was also excavated and refilled. However, the walls (I assume the exterior, or all load-bearing?) were not part of this and probably remained. Buyers of other plots, whose demolition of the houses located there was also commissioned at that time, had already experienced the surprise that some construction debris was deposited there. Therefore, they advised us to have a soil survey (or percussion survey => what is that?) conducted (already during the current reservation phase). What should be considered in this? As far as I have read, a normal soil survey does not necessarily include a contaminated sites report. In this case, that would certainly also be sensible, right? This is generally recommended here, also because the arsenic and heavy metal content is often elevated due to the historical mining. So far, of course, we still have no (concrete) ideas about exactly where our house will stand (but quite precisely, since we are supposed to attach directly to the multi-family house on the neighboring plot). Does it make sense to clarify this first, in order to then carry out the drillings exactly on their outline, or does it ultimately not depend on the exact meter and we could already commission this? The next question concerns the neighboring plot. As far as I have read, in the case of a boundary development, the consent of the owner of the neighboring plot must be obtained. Is this also to be obtained in our case, even if the city (without a development plan) prescribes the closed building style?
Many thanks in advance.