Yes, it certainly sounds like the detailed planning is being left to the craftsman on the construction site. With our general contractor, we were instructed to specify all sanitary fixtures including fittings with name + type BEFORE the sample selection. During the sample selection, the detailed positions including washbasin/WC heights etc. were determined. As an attachment to the sample selection, there were technical dimension drawings of the objects so that there were no ambiguities. Afterwards, the result went to the master plumber, who validated the planning and supplemented the pipe routing. It would have been noticed there. Additional expenses, e.g. an extra stud wall, different pipe routing, would have been at our expense. I needed a changed pipe routing in the cold water line (due to a chimney boiler with TAS). I discussed this with the plumber, received the surcharge by email, confirmed it, done.
A small episode on the side: Of course something went wrong! We have a built-in fitting from Grohe in the guest WC. They have a separate installation body for pretty much every fitting. The general contractor looked up the appropriate article number from his database and installed it. At the end of the tiling work, we wanted to mount the mixer lever and spout ourselves. DOES NOT FIT!! The set was correct, but the cartridge in the installation body had too large a diameter. Three days of research: Grohe changed the design of the series one year before installation (about 3 months before sample selection) and significantly slimmed it down. This required a new built-in body, but the database at the general contractor still knew the old article number. The parts matching the old built-in body were no longer available even from Grohe. So the general contractor replaced the built-in body from behind... the bathroom was completely tiled. Fortunately I have a wooden house. But the installer really sweated.